[ 馬懷德 ]——(2000-9-1) / 已閱37419次

[28] Kioa v. Wesr (1985)159 CLR 550 at 619-620.
[29] Roger Douglas and Melinda jones,Administrative Law,2th ed,The
Federation Press,p.506.
[30]Brcad Manufa Lturers of NSW v. Evans (1981)38 ALR 93.
[31]GCH1[1985] 1 AC 374.
[32] Cutts v. Commonwealth[1985] 59 ALR699.
[33]Marine Hull and Liability Insurance Co Ltd v. Hurford[1985] 62 ALR
253 at 259-60.
[34]See Kioa v. West [1985] 159 CLR 550.
[35]Allars,supra note,at p.262
[36]Qoyd v.Marine Council[1987]14 ALD 521.
[37]Allars,supra note,at p.265.
[38]Annamunthodo v.Olficld Workers'Trade Union[1961]AC 945.
[39]Allars,supra note,at p.265.
[40]Allars,supra note,at p. 267-268.
[41]Douglas &jones,supra note,at p. 527.

[42]French法官認(rèn)為，如果要求所有的難民案件都采用口頭聽證，那么就意味著很多案件要由缺乏經(jīng)驗(yàn)的難民官員處理，其結(jié)果只會(huì)降低行政決定的質(zhì)量，見Chcn
v. Mica [1993] 45 FCR 384.
[43]o'Rourke v. Miller[1985]156 CLR 342.
[44]R v Board of Apeal; Ex parte Kay [1916]22 CLR 183.
[45]See Douglas &jones,supra note,at p. 528.
[46]National Crime Authoity v. A[1988] 78 ALR 707.
[47]FAI Insurances Ltd v. Winncke[1981] 151 CLR 342 at 400-1.
[48]R v. Sussex Justices;Ex parte MacCarthy [1924] I KB 256 at 259.
[49]See Cane supra note,at p. 109.
[50]R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] 136 CLR 248.
[51]See Cane,supra note,at p. 109.
[52]Mahom v Air New Zealend Ltd [1983] 50 ALR 193.
[53]See Administrative Justice,some necessary reforms,(Report of
Committce of the JUSTICE-AllSouls Review of Administrative Law in the
United Kingdom) Oxford. Clarendon Press,at p. 24-74.
[54]See Douglas Jones, supra note,at p. 535.
[55]Clvin v. Carr [1979] 1 NSWLR 1.
[56]See supra note,per Brennan 1.
[57] 見1996年第4期《行政法學(xué)研究》。

總共4頁　　[1] [2] [3] 4

上一頁